Print Story Third-Person Stealth
Diary
By Christopher Robin was Murdered (Mon Oct 29, 2007 at 06:56:59 PM EST) (all tags)
Hit the Head. A modest proposal for certifying bar owners. If I'm ever in trouble and need to rely on the court-appointed defenders of Brooklyn, remind me to hang myself in my cell.


Bar

This part of the diary takes place at the Brazen Head – which is one of what would appear to be seven billion bars named the Brazen Head worldwide. The name comes from Joyce's weapons-grade modernist tome Ulysses: "You get a decent enough do at the Brazen Head." I assume that most of the folks naming their bars thusly are cribbing the name, and reference, from other bars. Otherwise, given the number of bars named Brazen Head, one must assume that every reader who has tackled and conquered what I'm regularly informed the very height of 20th century literature did, upon closing the book, decide to open a bar.

I'm not against the idea that everybody who finishes Ulysses then needs must open a bar. In fact, I'd ever support a law that made it so. I'd even allows so it should be mandatory. I think we'd weed out a look of vacuous fashionista star-fuckers – the sort that make bars entirely made of mirrored surfaces and serve cosmos out of the hollowed skulls of illegal maids because that's the trend of the microsecond (oops, already un-cool – Tristan! – ditch these gauche skulls in the alley and bring me fetal kittens and the blender – I've got a hot tip from the trench soldiers at Vice) – if we told them they'd have to read a book. And I mean read in the old fashioned "look at words" sense. Not so much because I think reading something made of dead trees is so much greater, but because I think many of these folks will try to squeeze under the restriction by absorbing the book while sweating though the down dog at their bikram session. Tell them that they need to pay serious attention to white dude with an eye patch who wasn't in Pirates with "Oreo" and "the Dep Charge" and they'll turn their attention other endeavors. Most likely a dog spa.

This particular Brazen Head is run by a genially alcoholic dude who, I'm told by a reliable source, used to make his living traveling around Second World countries rebuilding from civil and ethnic strife, diffusing potentially embarrassing post-war ordinance.

Which makes me think of another thing we could require potential bar owners to do: Read Joyce or go dig through the rubble of a former day-care center lookin' for to defuse an un-detonated barracks bustin' "flying carbomb."

Where was I? Oh. This particular Brazen Head is found near the corner of Atlantic and Court, nearly the seat of the borough's government and around the corner from Court Street theaters, home of that wonderful class of film-enthusiast: the Courtesans. The Head's claim to fame is its excellent beer selection. On any given night, the bartenders, all nice folks so far as I've found, have a bracket (to borrow an organist's term) of some 15 or 20 beers – efficiently covering the spectrum of beer art. Plus, on any given night, they've got one or two cask brews. Two or three times a year (maybe four, my memory gets blurry) they hold a "Cask-fest" which is like a little Woodstock for drunkards with upmarket palates. Perhaps the most beautiful product of Brooklyn since we sent Walt Whitman into the world.

The Head ain't very large. Single floor.  A couch area on either side of the front door, then a bar stretching down the entire length of the joint, terminating in a small darts area in back. There's a small and pleasant irregular quadrilateral of a garden out back.

This week, I found myself waiting at the Head for Dean. He was running late, so I was reading at the bar, the dim lighting just sufficient for the task. I was at the foot of the bar's "L" shape and behind me was a clutch of maybe four or five folks. Let's say four. Three dudes and one chick. All professionally dressed: suits and ties for the men, jacket and conservative skirt for the woman. They were already well in their cups. Their conversation revealed they were lawyers.

When I entered the bar, they were already in deep conversation regarding a case the woman was taking to trial.

From what I could gather, the defendant is being charged with cruelty towards animals. He allegedly starved his dog to death. The defendant, from what I could make out, went away on trip. Now he was having some trouble with the landlord and he claims the landlord told him not to come back home because he (the landlord) was going to change the locks. The defendant finished his trip and, instead of going home, he went to a friend's apartment.

A couple weeks later, some cops showed up to bust him. His dog, which was still in the apartment, had starved to death. It rotting corpse had altered the neighbors to that fact that something was amiss. The landlord found the ex-canine and called the five-oh.

Lawyer guy #1: "He never went back to his place?"

Lawyer girl: "No. Well. No. He though, you know, that the, um, landlord was just going to throw his stuff out and change the locks. And. He. I guess. He says he thought you wouldn't take all his stuff without taking the dog."

Lawyer guy #2 was on a cell phone, despite the fact that several "No Cell Phones" signs are displayed in the bar. "What. But they're our fleas. Yeah. Are you serious?"

Lawyer #3: "She's going to crucify him. She's got a dog at home. She's going to crucify him."

Lawyer girl: "I don't think a jury would convict. If you explain what he thought was going on, I don't see how a jury can convict."

Lawyer #3: "She's going to crucify him. She's got a dog at home. She's going to crucify him."

Lawyer girl: "But. There's some stuff. I was checking out his story. There's some stuff that doesn't, um, check out. Like he says he called all the time. Called the landlord all the time. Again and again, but, like. Called the landlord, but there wasn't any record of that on his phone."

Lawyer guy #2: "But we're already here. What? No. Are you serious."

Lawyer guy #1: "Just 'cause there's no record didn't mean he didn't call."

Lawyer #3: "She's going to crucify him. She's got a dog at home. She's going to crucify him."

Lawyer girl: "Right."

Lawyer guy #1: "He could have used a pay phone."

Lawyer girl: "Right. Or his wife's phone."

Lawyer guy #2 takes the cell and handed it to #3: "This guy had a wife?"

Lawyer #3: "Hey. Where are you? What? But they're our fleas. We've all got fleas."

Lawyer girl: "Yeah. I don't really know much about her. I guess I should find out."

Lawyer guy #2: "Did she live at the house?"

Lawyer girl: "I guess so. I guess I should find out."

Lawyer guy #2: "'Cause if she lived there, then his excuse is utter shit. You know that. Right?"

Lawyer girl: "I guess I should find out."

Later the conversation turned to what all agreed was the inordinate amount of alcohol-related blackouts Lawyer #3 was having lately.

Song Title: Junk Science, Third-Person Stealth

< the second week of my new life | BBC White season: 'Rivers of Blood' >
Third-Person Stealth | 13 comments (13 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback
I suspect... by toxicfur (2.00 / 0) #1 Mon Oct 29, 2007 at 08:39:43 PM EST
that there is something in Ulysses itself that, when one finishes it, causes one to have an indescribable, unquenchable yearning to open a bar. And so those poor souls who finally get to the end in a mad Ahab-like quest to be among the literary elite find that their lives just won't be complete until they're serving as many gin&tonics as they're drinking.

Lawyer #3 is right. They're going to crucify any dude who let his dog starve to death. And his excuse is full of shit. That said -- I sincerely hope I never need the legal services of those lawyers....
-----
If you don't get a Bonnie, my universe will not make sense. --blixco


I suspect by ambrosen (4.00 / 2) #3 Tue Oct 30, 2007 at 06:55:10 AM EST
that even if everyone who finished Ulysses did open a bar, it wouldn't make a big difference to the number of bars that were opened.

Meh, I need a G&T.

[ Parent ]

Welcome, O Brazen Head! by spacejack (2.00 / 0) #2 Mon Oct 29, 2007 at 10:12:25 PM EST
I go to encounter for the millionth time the experience of disintegrating conversations that cell phones are to blame for.

A "no cellphones" sign in a bar? I've never seen that before. Sounds like a good idea to me, but needs stricter enforcement.

There's a Joyce-inspired pub a few blocks away from me. It's called "The James Joyce".



No by gazbo (2.00 / 0) #5 Tue Oct 30, 2007 at 08:53:23 AM EST
It sounds like a good idea right up until it's enforced  Then you realise it's really rather anachronistic.  It seems like a good idea because of those few but memorable times when someone is braying down the phone for half an hour.

However, the many times you're out and a friend phones to ask which pub you're meeting at, or you phone the missus to see if she's ready to pick you up, or...

If you don't use mobiles for that then fine, but I assure you it's damn useful and far more common than the obnoxious calls that would make you long for a ban.


"Engarde!" cried the larvae, huskily. - Scrymarch

[ Parent ]

You can't selectively enforce a rule . . . by Christopher Robin was Murdered (2.00 / 1) #6 Tue Oct 30, 2007 at 09:03:29 AM EST
That doesn't exist.

The point of a "no cell" rule is not to end all cell conversations, but to have a posted and unambiguous rule you can point to when you need to tell some jackass to get of the phone.

It works on the same principle as cutting off people who have had too much. There's no single measure of "too much" that any bartender could ever hope to establish. But it does allow bartenders to cut off troublemakers as needed.

[ Parent ]

Not true . . . by slozo (2.00 / 0) #13 Wed Oct 31, 2007 at 08:08:51 AM EST
. . . about the bartending "cut off" line at all - if every well trained bartender actually followed the rules they were supposed to (in Canada, under the Smart Serve pseudo-licensing program), no one would be drunk.

There are charts to follow for body mass versus amount imbibed, behaviours to look for, etc. And no bar or bartender would make any money if these ridiculously strict guidelines were followed (in the smart serve guidebook, they actually state several times that once you see the symptoms of drunkeness, you must stop serving that person). So, basically, overserving is regularly done to greater and lesser degrees, usually in a selective way.

But if it gets "legal" (ie: a person drives home drunk and kills someone), and you were found to overserve, the bartender and bar resposible are on the hook somewhat. What a country, eh?

And about cell phones? Easy rule: annoying cell phone conversation happens - turn up the music. Cell phone leaves bar because it's too loud. A bartender who doesn't have control over his environment and isn't protecting it for his other customers is in dereliction of duty . . .

[ Parent ]

I feel your pain . . . by slozo (2.00 / 0) #4 Tue Oct 30, 2007 at 08:28:27 AM EST
. . . the conversation reminded me of bartending, which is like your evening - except you are forced to listen to conversations just as annoying as that all night. You get to imbibe an addictive depressant (well, I got to, anyway) while listening to everyone unload their personal problems on you, as if every bartender was the dump at which they unloaded their garbage.

But these lawyers sounded particularly retarded . . . or maybe you took some literary licence? Here's hoping.



You say "addictive depressant" . . . by Christopher Robin was Murdered (4.00 / 1) #7 Tue Oct 30, 2007 at 09:09:09 AM EST
Like it was a bad thing.

The lawyers actually sound better in my version of their conversation. I cut out a six or seven minute effort to collectively remember the case that made "just because there's no record doesn't mean it didn't happen" a legit defense principle. I started to write it and then realized that, sober as I am, I would be unable to recreate that part of the conversation.

[ Parent ]

So what were you reading by sasquatchan (2.00 / 0) #8 Tue Oct 30, 2007 at 09:09:24 AM EST
while passing away the time at the bar ? Can't leave us hanging there.. Or did you actually pull out a battered copy of Ulysses ?

And is the owner a mick ? Heck, do the Irish even like Joyce ?



Reading by Christopher Robin was Murdered (4.00 / 1) #9 Tue Oct 30, 2007 at 09:26:20 AM EST
I was reading George Eliot's "The Lifted Veil." It's a novella she cranked out during a pause in the writing of Mill on the Floss. Unlike her novels, "TLV" is this weird tale style book about a psychic man who figures out that his wife is poisoning him. Her publishers were embarrassed by its sci-fi/horror elements and sat on it for 20 years or so. The reception of the tale was so harsh that Eliot, despite her interest in sci-fi/horror themes, never wrote another significant story in the genre.

I don't want to speak for the Irish, though I've heard tell that they, like Americans and Brits (but unlike the Russians, the Canadians, and the residents of the tiny island monarchy of Tonga), hold that literary taste is an individual matter and that liking or not liking Joyce isn't a collectivized thing (unlike the Russians' compulsory love of Tolstoy, the Canadians' legally mandated appreciation of Richard Comely, and the adoration-by-fiat Tongans feel for Lithuanian Symbolist poet and novelist Vincas "Putinas" Mykolaitis).

[ Parent ]

Ouch! An edit for you: by greyrat (2.00 / 0) #10 Tue Oct 30, 2007 at 09:46:55 AM EST
"It[s] rotting corpse had altered[alerted] the neighbors..."

That one hurt as I read past it. Great story otherwise. And with all due respect to:


~
There is absolutely no correlation or causation amongst intelligence, power, talent and wealth.
Kha-Nyou


Thanks. by Christopher Robin was Murdered (4.00 / 1) #11 Tue Oct 30, 2007 at 09:58:30 AM EST
But I don't edit.

[ Parent ]

Bu they're our fleas. by blixco (4.00 / 1) #12 Tue Oct 30, 2007 at 10:15:50 AM EST
Of all the truths we must embrace:

We've all got fleas.
---------------------------------
"You bring the weasel, I'll bring the whiskey." - kellnerin


Third-Person Stealth | 13 comments (13 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback